Unfortunately, Mrs. Bühring seems to be in her article ... Inciting the Hänel case to have completely taken on the glue. Because in this case, as the author Birgit Kelle wrote on the welt.de web portal on December 19, 2017, it is about the “perfidious staging of scandal in order to overturn law with model trial”.
Ms. Hänel is quoted as saying that “women in need have fewer and fewer opportunities to find doctor - especially in rural areas”. This is out of the question: If you enter “abortion in me” in Google, the algorithm “near me” completes it all by itself and then automatically s the contact information of nearby doctors and organizations that offer abortions. In addition, Germany is covered with dense network of 1,600 registered advice centers, which can be found extremely easily using GPS-based location service provided by the Federal Center for Health Education.
Also the “All World Weapon Nazi Card “(Kelle) is not even correct in terms of content. The said paragraph comes from the penal code of the German Reich of 1871. Although it was overridden from 1926 to 1933 under pressure from the Independent Social Democratic Party (USPD), the Communists (KPD) and parts of the SPD, it was in the legislation of the Federal Republic actively taken up and repeatedly adapted and confirmed (1976, 1993). Incidentally, the proponents of the abolition ban seem to have no problem with other regulations in the health sector that, in contrast to Section 219 a, originally came from the National Socialists, such as the tax exemption for Sunday, holiday and night work surcharges in care It was introduced in 1940 primarily to provide financial incentive for arms production workers.
Abortion is not normal medical service, but at best human tragedy. Do we really want to normalize them through advertising?
Prof. Dr. med. Paul Cullen , 48163 Münster